| 
        php.net | support | documentation | report a bug | advanced search | search howto | statistics | random bug | login | 
  [2018-07-02 22:48 UTC] andrew dot marek at sbcglobal dot net
 Description:
------------
Note below that the For loop's left bracket does not immediately follow the for loop conditional's right closing bracket. The interpreter does not throw an error and permits this code to execute. Result: For loop does nothing - whether it tries to execute, gets confused, or simply ignores the code - I don't know - the actual result is the program runs and the For loop fails.
Fix: Once the interpreter detects a for loop the syntax checker  should demand an opening bracket to immediately follow the closing paren on the for loop's conditional.
Test script:
---------------
for  ($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14)	  
      $ib1 = $ib + 1;  $ib2 = $ib + 2; $ib3 = $ib + 3;
      $ib4 = $ib + 4; $ib5 = $ib + 5;  $ib6 = $ib + 6;
      $ib7 = $ib + 7;  $ib8 = $ib + 8; $ib9 = $ib + 9; 
      $ib10 = $ib + 10; $ib11 = $ib + 11; 
     {$ib12 = $ib + 12;  $ib13 = $ib + 13; 
				  
      if  (isset($ivcarrp[$ib13]))   
	  {if  ($ivcarrp[$ib13] == "XX")
	       {$bypasscnt++;
	        continue;}
	  }
     }	
PatchesPull RequestsHistoryAllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commits             
             | 
    |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
            
                 
                Copyright © 2001-2025 The PHP GroupAll rights reserved.  | 
        Last updated: Tue Nov 04 09:00:01 2025 UTC | 
It's not PHP's fault that your badly-formatted code means you misunderstand what you wrote. spam2 has already pointed out that there is a syntax error in the code you posted (the continue is not inside a loop). If the code you posted came from inside another loop then even that isn't an error. What you wrote is syntactically identical to for($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14) $ib1 = $ib + 1; $ib2 = $ib + 2; $ib3 = $ib + 3; $ib4 = $ib + 4; $ib5 = $ib + 5; $ib6 = $ib + 6; $ib7 = $ib + 7; $ib8 = $ib + 8; $ib9 = $ib + 9; $ib10 = $ib + 10; $ib11 = $ib + 11; $ib12 = $ib + 12; $ib13 = $ib + 13; if(isset($ivcarrp[$ib13])) { if($ivcarrp[$ib13] == "XX") { $bypasscnt++; continue; } } Which is perfectly legitimate syntax."the For loop's opening left brace which should appear to the left of $ib12 = $ib + 12; " Your for loop does not *have* an opening brace. Your entire for loop is for ($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14) $ib1 = $ib + 1; The opening brace further down has syntactically nothing to do with the for() loop. I'll write it again with those braces put back: for ($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14) $ib1 = $ib + 1; $ib2 = $ib + 2; $ib3 = $ib + 3; $ib4 = $ib + 4; $ib5 = $ib + 5; $ib6 = $ib + 6; $ib7 = $ib + 7; $ib8 = $ib + 8; $ib9 = $ib + 9; $ib10 = $ib + 10; $ib11 = $ib + 11; { $ib12 = $ib + 12; $ib13 = $ib + 13; if (isset($ivcarrp[$ib13])) { if ($ivcarrp[$ib13] == "XX") { $bypasscnt++; continue; } } } That outermost pair of braces has nothing to do with the for loop that began and ended a dozen lines ago. It may surprise you to learn that you can put braces around statements like that without them being part of a control structure, but you can (it is often done, for example, in switch statements). In some languages (C#, Java, C) it would introduce a new scope for local variables, but PHP doesn't do block-level scoping so the braces have no significance and can therefore be dropped (as I did earlier) and the result would be identical. "Point is that my code was written incorrectly for what it was intended to do" You mean _you_ wrote it incorrectly. "because the opening For loop Brace which I placed to the left of $ib12 = $ib + 12; should have been placed to the left of $ib1 = $ib1 + 1;" That's your mistake, not PHP's. "therefore the For loop syntax checker should have asked where the opening brace is (it did not do that)" How is PHP supposed to magically know that there should be a brace there? It's not required by the language. "The PHP on-line manual does not indicate that the statement after the For loops three expressions needs to be enclosed in braces but all the examples below it do and so do the reference manuals." The manual says that the for(;;) is followed by a statement. No, it doesn't say that it has to be enclosed in braces - because it doesn't. Just because you assumed that they're necessary doesn't make the fact they aren't a bug. It's not stated there explicitly what a statement is (any more than it's stated explicitly on the pages for while switch, or if), because it would be redundant with was already covered in the Control Structures introduction, where a whole paragraph is devoted to the subject (in fact, it's the only paragraph in the introduction). It will pay you to read it because it says what the braces are for.finally the prove that "Actually the code you claim is syntactically identical to mine is not - you misplaced the For loop's opening left brace which should appear to the left of $ib12 = $ib + 12;" is simply nonsense when you don't write python code the code could be formatted like the -w output because whitespaces are NOT part of the syntax - only the ; matters php -h -w Output source with stripped comments and whitespace -------------------- [harry@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ php -w test.php <?php for($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14) $ib1 = $ib + 1; $ib2 = $ib + 2; $ib3 = $ib + 3; $ib4 = $ib + 4; $ib5 = $ib + 5; $ib6 = $ib + 6; $ib7 = $ib + 7; $ib8 = $ib + 8; $ib9 = $ib + 9; $ib10 = $ib + 10; $ib11 = $ib + 11; $ib12 = $ib + 12; $ib13 = $ib + 13; if(isset($ivcarrp[$ib13])) { if($ivcarrp[$ib13] == "XX") { $bypasscnt++; } } -------------------- [harry@srv-rhsoft:/downloads]$ cat test.php <?php for($ib = 0; $ib < $ncountp; $ib = $ib + 14) $ib1 = $ib + 1; $ib2 = $ib + 2; $ib3 = $ib + 3; $ib4 = $ib + 4; $ib5 = $ib + 5; $ib6 = $ib + 6; $ib7 = $ib + 7; $ib8 = $ib + 8; $ib9 = $ib + 9; $ib10 = $ib + 10; $ib11 = $ib + 11; $ib12 = $ib + 12; $ib13 = $ib + 13; if(isset($ivcarrp[$ib13])) { if($ivcarrp[$ib13] == "XX") { $bypasscnt++; } }