php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login

go to bug id or search bugs for

Doc Bug #74048 Should explain how Collator::create() compares to new Collator()
Submitted: 2017-02-05 18:30 UTC Modified: 2021-11-11 11:17 UTC
Votes:1
Avg. Score:5.0 ± 0.0
Reproduced:1 of 1 (100.0%)
Same Version:1 (100.0%)
Same OS:1 (100.0%)
From: teo8976 at gmail dot com Assigned:
Status: Verified Package: I18N and L10N related
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS:
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Developer Edit
 [2017-02-05 18:30 UTC] teo8976 at gmail dot com 
Description:
------------
---
From manual page: http://www.php.net/collator.create
---

Collator has a constructor and a static create() method.
No clue is given in the documentaion about why one should use "Collator::create()" rather than the constructor  "new Collator()". If thery are completely equivalent then it must be stated explicitly.

Patches

Pull Requests

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2017-02-06 14:29 UTC] cmb@php.net
-Status: Open +Status: Verified -Package: Documentation problem +Package: intl
 [2021-03-04 13:01 UTC] cmb@php.net 
Without having a closer look, the difference is that the function
and static method return NULL on failure, while the constructor
returns an "empty" object in that case (cf. the return value
sections).  The latter would be pretty uncommon, since
constructors usually throw on failure, but changing this would be
a BC break (if the docs are correct in this regard).

Anyhow, it might be beneficial to actually merge the different
pages.
 [2021-11-11 11:17 UTC] nikic@php.net
-Package: intl +Package: I18N and L10N related
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2024 The PHP Group
All rights reserved. 		Last updated: Sat Dec 21 11:01:30 2024 UTC