php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login

go to bug id or search bugs for

Request #79369 Syntactic sugar for Closures ($object->method::function)
Submitted: 2020-03-11 17:46 UTC Modified: 2020-03-11 23:12 UTC
From: txigreman at hotmail dot com Assigned:
Status: Suspended Package: *General Issues
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS:
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Welcome back! If you're the original bug submitter, here's where you can edit the bug or add additional notes.
If this is not your bug, you can add a comment by following this link.
If this is your bug, but you forgot your password, you can retrieve your password here.
Password:
Status:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: txigreman at hotmail dot com
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2020-03-11 17:46 UTC] txigreman at hotmail dot com 
Description:
------------
Hi,

Actually, you can can create a Closure with any of this:

$closure = function() { return $this->method(); }
$closure = fn() => $this->method();
$closure = \Closure::fromCallable([$this, 'method']);

I think it would be greate to have a simpler way to create a Closure. I suggest to add a simpler variant:

$closure = $this->method::function;
$closure = Class::staticMethod::function;
$closure = trim::function;

It mimics the functionality from MyClass:class and $object::class, so the syntax is user-friendly.
Additionally, it does not uses a new keywork, so I think it has no backwards compatibility breaks (or so I hope).

Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2020-03-11 17:52 UTC] nikic@php.net
-Package: PHP Language Specification +Package: *General Issues
 [2020-03-11 22:06 UTC] rowan dot collins at gmail dot com 
Hi,

This kind of broad feature request is generally best raised on the PHP Internals mailing list (https://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php) which gets a lot more attention than this bug tracker.

As it happens, there was a discussion on precisely this feature last month! You can see an archive here: https://externals.io/message/108459

The main points of discussion were:

* Should it return a string (like ::class does) or a closure?
* Function names are resolved at run-time, so it couldn't be processed at compile-time like ::class (mostly) is (this also means we can't have a single ::nameof syntax)
* A few alternative syntaxes were suggested, particularly to better handle instance and static methods.

Thanks for getting involved. :)
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]
 [2020-03-11 23:12 UTC] requinix@php.net
-Status: Open +Status: Suspended
 [2020-03-12 09:10 UTC] txigreman at hotmail dot com 
Hi Rowan,

Thanks for your reply.

I've readed the externals link, and subscribed to the internals mailing list. Really hoping to colaborate.
How can I write to the chain? Do I Have to wait to get an email and then reply to it?
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2021 The PHP Group
All rights reserved. 		Last updated: Thu Jan 28 16:01:23 2021 UTC