php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login
Doc Bug #66935 documentation reflects of a version that is no longer available.
Submitted: 2014-03-19 20:26 UTC Modified: 2016-08-17 09:49 UTC
From: arjan at blackoak dot net Assigned: mike (profile)
Status: Closed Package: HTTP related
PHP Version: 5.5.10 OS: FreeBSD 9.2
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Welcome! If you don't have a Git account, you can't do anything here.
You can add a comment by following this link or if you reported this bug, you can edit this bug over here.
(description)
Block user comment
Status: Assign to:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: arjan at blackoak dot net
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2014-03-19 20:26 UTC] arjan at blackoak dot net
Description:
------------
---
From manual page: http://www.php.net/function.http-post-fields
---

This documentation section covers the http pecl module until version 1.x, pecl currently has a 2.0.x version, which is completely different and not compatible in any way, shape or form.

It had me looking in all the wrong places for an hour :)

Test script:
---------------
not relevant

Expected result:
----------------
not relevant

Actual result:
--------------
not relevant

Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2014-03-19 22:00 UTC] philip@php.net
Good point. I'm not (yet?) familiar with the situation of this extension, but it appears version 2+ is documented here:

  http://devel-m6w6.rhcloud.com/mdref/http

Is this permanent?
 [2014-06-24 10:30 UTC] salathe@php.net
-Assigned To: +Assigned To: mike
 [2014-06-24 10:30 UTC] salathe@php.net
Assigning to extension maintainer to make a decision one way or the other.
 [2014-06-24 11:32 UTC] tyrael@php.net
I've suggested using a separate package(albeit http2 would be a bit ambiguous), but never got a reply back:
https://www.mail-archive.com/pecl-dev@lists.php.net/msg00481.html
now that we have 2.0 releases with stable stability, more and more people will upgrade to 2.0 and notice that the 2.0 version isn't backward compatible with 1.0.
Not sure what would be the best action at this point.
 [2014-07-10 12:09 UTC] mike@php.net
Yeah, well, the majority was of the opinion to keep the package name. That's what we've got now... :-/
 [2016-08-17 09:49 UTC] mike@php.net
-Status: Assigned +Status: Closed
 [2016-08-17 09:49 UTC] mike@php.net
Old docs have since been removed.
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2019 The PHP Group
All rights reserved.
Last updated: Fri Oct 18 11:01:27 2019 UTC