php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login
Bug #44040 dealing with error-reports is unacceptable
Submitted: 2008-02-04 15:13 UTC Modified: 2008-02-05 05:38 UTC
From: spam2 at rhsoft dot net Assigned:
Status: Not a bug Package: Website problem
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS:
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Welcome! If you don't have a Git account, you can't do anything here.
You can add a comment by following this link or if you reported this bug, you can edit this bug over here.
(description)
Block user comment
Status: Assign to:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: spam2 at rhsoft dot net
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2008-02-04 15:13 UTC] spam2 at rhsoft dot net
Description:
------------
http://bugs.php.net/?id=42262

What crazy person implements "You can not comment bogus reports or change their status." in the system from the time any crazy guy believes to set this status?

Do you think its fun for me testing snaphsots and writing bugreports and see ignoring them and make me unable to comment  this - I make this work for helping you to do yours easier and getting updates containing less bugs/problems.

Damend do not set to "bogus" before inital-reporter can say anything to an answer getting months after report or fix this idiotic system so the reporter can make clear his point of view maybe resulting in re-opening!
_______________


I have no time to check this now, 
but i will see the next days running a snapshot build

The NEWS-File from source is not useful because there are no dates

It is simple NOT ACCEPTABLE if the function will not exist any longer because the truth is that it is disabled in php6 so the function have simply to return false. Where is a reason to break this?

If the error-message is away th bureport has to get status "fixed", if it still exists the NEWS-File and actual result are not the same, status "bogus" this time a can not see!
______________

I have a problem with the way php is developed and bugreports are handled. Everytime will anyone tell me "bogus" and after long discussions the solution is pointly the one i requestet from the begin. 

The game in this bugreport setting to bogus/open and bogus again some months after initial report is a bad joke also as nonone makes a clear statement - as bugreporter it is not my job to read every mailing-list and archive - HERE is the point for clear statements for THIS report
___________

Sample:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42077
See comment 2/3 from jani
The second answer was after a private mail from me to let me know if some people ace total crazy

http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42836
Instead checking what goes wrong comes a fucking comment
Damned it is a problem with php6 if you randomly get openbasedir-errors showing that settings from another vhost will be mixed and with the same configurations php5 had never a problem in any way - you can reload the page one, two, three times and the error goes away and another virtual host has the same with settings from the last visited.

If you handle bug-reports in this way finally many people will not test snapshots and writes reports in future - is this what you want?





Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2008-02-05 02:06 UTC] davidc@php.net
Please use a decent language.
 [2008-02-05 05:38 UTC] bjori@php.net
When a bug report is marked bogus, but you are sure it is valid, please take it up on internals@lists.php.net.
The bugtracker is not a discussion or help forum of any kind.
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2024 The PHP Group
All rights reserved.
Last updated: Sun May 05 22:01:29 2024 UTC