php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login
Request #26273 conditional concatenator
Submitted: 2003-11-16 10:04 UTC Modified: 2003-11-17 21:03 UTC
From: tagg_maiwald at yahoo dot com Assigned:
Status: Not a bug Package: Feature/Change Request
PHP Version: 4.3.4 OS: Windows 98
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Anyone can comment on a bug. Have a simpler test case? Does it work for you on a different platform? Let us know!
Just going to say 'Me too!'? Don't clutter the database with that please !
Your email address:
MUST BE VALID
Solve the problem:
27 + 1 = ?
Subscribe to this entry?

 
 [2003-11-16 10:04 UTC] tagg_maiwald at yahoo dot com
Description:
------------
A conditional concatenator would evaluate a boolean test, then concatenate a value onto the left operand. This operator would simplify scripts by eliminating a kludge. The motive behind this request is to readily construct SQL queries via PHP which can be easily reread and understood with minimal confusion by a follow-on person maintaining the script(s).

Reproduce code:
---------------
// kludge
$sz_string = 'foo';
if ($bool_test) { $sz_string .= 'bar'; }
else { $sz_string .= 'baz'; }
echo $sz_string

// conditional concatenator
$sz_string = 'foo';
$sz_string .? ($bool_test) 'bar' : 'baz';
echo $sz_string

Expected result:
----------------
foobar

Actual result:
--------------
foobar

Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2003-11-17 16:50 UTC] jay@php.net
How is this any different from the already-implemented 
ternary operator? 
 
$sz_string .= ($bool_test) ? 'bar' : 'baz'; 
 
J 
 [2003-11-17 21:03 UTC] tagg_maiwald at yahoo dot com
Sorry. Need more sleep.
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2024 The PHP Group
All rights reserved.
Last updated: Sat Jun 01 08:01:32 2024 UTC