php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login

go to bug id or search bugs for

Doc Bug #55830 (minor) contant order
Submitted: 2011-10-02 09:57 UTC Modified: 2011-10-08 21:38 UTC
From: moosh@php.net Assigned: frozenfire (profile)
Status: Wont fix Package: Documentation problem
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS:
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Developer Edit
Welcome back! If you're the original bug submitter, here's where you can edit the bug or add additional notes.
If you forgot your password, you can retrieve your password here.
Password:
Status:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: moosh@php.net
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2011-10-02 09:57 UTC] moosh@php.net 
Description:
------------
---
From manual page: http://www.php.net/reserved.variables.server#refsect1-reserved.variables.server-indices
---
What's the order of server indices ?

Why  not alphabetical order ?

Patches

Pull Requests

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2011-10-08 21:10 UTC] frozenfire@php.net
-Status: Open +Status: Assigned -Assigned To: +Assigned To: frozenfire
 [2011-10-08 21:30 UTC] frozenfire@php.net
-Status: Assigned +Status: Wont fix
 [2011-10-08 21:30 UTC] frozenfire@php.net 
At first, I was inclined to agree with you. Then, after some thinking, it 
occurred to me that the indices are currently grouped based upon the function 
they relate to.

The current ordering is sensible, so I won't change it.
 [2011-10-08 21:38 UTC] moosh@php.net 
@frozenfire I agree, but  perhaps  explain it in top of list ?

 How  I discover it. I was searching "REQUEST_TIME" to confirm it exists, I Found REQUEST_URI, and REQUEST_TIME was not near REQUEST_URI. So in a first time  I thought be on a wrong way. It's only later I saw it  upper in the list.
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2025 The PHP Group
All rights reserved. 		Last updated: Wed Feb 05 15:01:32 2025 UTC