Description:
------------
Assume there a two classes. The first class is an abstract class which only defines a default protected method having no parameters. The second class (could be in same file) will extend the first class and overrides the method from the first class using a single parameter. This will run without any notices if i use error_reporting( E_ALL ^ E_STRICT ).

but if i will include the file within an other file, it will result in a "Strict Standards" notice.

It does not depend on the way i call it - apache or cli.

Reproduce code:
---------------
----- FILE 1 (file1.php)-----
<?php
error_reporting( E_ALL ^ E_STRICT );
abstract class AbstractTest {
	protected function _update() {}
}

abstract class Test extends AbstractTest {
	protected function _update( $var ) {}
}
?>


------ FILE 2 (file2.php)-----
<?php
	error_reporting( E_ALL ^ E_STRICT );
 	include 'file1.php';
?>

Expected result:
----------------
both ways should run in same way.

Actual result:
--------------
- calling the first example file (file1.php) directly will run fine.
- calling the second example file (file2.php), which will include the first file, results in the following notice:
"Strict Standards: Declaration of Test::_update() should be compatible with that of AbstractTest::_update() in \htdocs\file1.php on line 8"