|
php.net | support | documentation | report a bug | advanced search | search howto | statistics | random bug | login |
PatchesPull RequestsHistoryAllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commits
[2021-09-22 16:40 UTC] cmb@php.net
-Package: Compile Warning
+Package: Scripting Engine problem
[2021-09-22 16:40 UTC] cmb@php.net
[2021-11-12 13:48 UTC] nikic@php.net
-Status: Open
+Status: Wont fix
[2021-11-12 13:48 UTC] nikic@php.net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001-2025 The PHP GroupAll rights reserved. |
Last updated: Fri Oct 24 07:00:01 2025 UTC |
Description: ------------ While I perfectly understand why I cannot pass by reference a literal, I whish that I could initialize a variable in the same place where I pass it as a parameter. MyFunction( $var2 = "two" ); I think it is more readable, understandable and inline with the syntax of the language. Maybe I'm missing some symple syntactic sugar to work around this (apart from initializing the variable the line before). I understand that the result of assignment is an anonimous literal with containing the just assigned value (hence the warning), but I think that the compiler could be just that little bit smarter to allow for such a syntax, since the semantic is perfectly clear: assign the literal to the variable, then pass the variable (and not its value to the function. Also the algorithm is quite simple: if the actual parameter is a literal and a variable is expected, if the literal is the product of an assignment pass the left part of the assignment to the function. Actually I don't know if the parser can trace back where a value is coming from. Thank you for your comments and explanantions. Test script: --------------- <?php function MyFunction (&$parameter) { echo $parameter."\n"; } $var1 = 'one'; MyFunction( $var1 ); MyFunction( $var2 = "two" ); Expected result: ---------------- one two Actual result: -------------- one Notice: Only variables should be passed by reference in /in/iJAlU on line 7 two