|
php.net | support | documentation | report a bug | advanced search | search howto | statistics | random bug | login |
[2018-11-14 18:42 UTC] jpauli@php.net
Description:
------------
This behavior is wether right or wrong ; let's debate :
Test script:
---------------
class A {
private static $foo = 'Afoo';
function foo() { return static::$foo; }
}
class B extends A { }
$b = new B;
echo $b->foo();
Expected result:
----------------
PHP <= 7.3 shows :
Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Cannot access property B::$foo in XXXX
PHP-master shows :
the string 'Afoo'
Actual result:
--------------
What should be the right behavior ?
Considering that the same use-case using non-static attribute, and non static classic $this accesses the attributes just all right in all PHP versions
Should private static attributes be inherited, or not ?
PatchesPull RequestsHistoryAllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commits
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001-2025 The PHP GroupAll rights reserved. |
Last updated: Sat Nov 01 08:00:02 2025 UTC |
Despite, this behavior change was unintended, I think, the new static properties visibility rules are more consistent with regular object properties. <?php class A { private $foo = 'foo'; static private $bar = 'bar'; function foo() { var_dump($this->foo); } static function bar() { var_dump(static::$bar); } } class B extends A { } $b = new B; $b->foo(); // works B::bar(); // didn't work before master