| Bug #47132 | Grouped optional params not grouped correctly. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 16 Jan 11:04pm UTC | Modified: | 20 Nov 11:31am UTC | ||
| From: | RQuadling at GMail dot com | Assigned to: | bjori | ||
| Status: | Closed | Category: | Documentation problem | ||
| Version: | Irrelevant | OS: | n/a | ||
[16 Jan 11:04pm UTC] RQuadling at GMail dot com
[17 Jan 11:40am UTC] bjori@php.net
See also http://markmail.org/message/tmta77d6ypnj7v4e
[20 Nov 10:50am UTC] vrana@php.net
We document these functions as two synopses. It's also more readable.
[20 Nov 11:31am UTC] RQuadling at GMail dot com
Yes (http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=253220). DocBook will support the mechanism of grouping optional parameters, so it is feasible that DocBook documents will contain this construct and as such support within PhD would be nice. I don't think it is more readable. The syntax of describing a function's prototype is well understood. It looks unnecessary. It was just the lack of support within DocBook and hence PhD that hindered this and required the 2 synopses approach.
