php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login

go to bug id or search bugs for

Request #56983 Patch for the release promotion mails
Submitted: 2006-04-27 02:30 UTC Modified: 2006-10-06 07:41 UTC
From: wiesemann@php.net Assigned: mj (profile)
Status: Closed Package: PECL website (PECL)
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS: Irrelevant
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Welcome back! If you're the original bug submitter, here's where you can edit the bug or add additional notes.
If this is not your bug, you can add a comment by following this link.
If this is your bug, but you forgot your password, you can retrieve your password here.
Password:
Status:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: wiesemann@php.net
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2006-04-27 02:30 UTC] wiesemann@php.net 
Description:
------------
(was a mail to webmaster list, but a feature request here should be more suitable)

I'd like to propose an (untested) patch for the release promotion mails:
http://www.markwiesemann.eu/php/pearweb_release_promotion.patch

Changes (each change two times: for v1 and v2 of package.xml)
- use more suitable lengths for the "rules" below the "categories" of the mails
- show whether the person is inactive (code adopted from
package-info.php; the query used in package::info for getting the authors also fetches the 'active' field from the database, so this should work as expected)

Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2006-06-15 15:29 UTC] mj@php.net 
The patch looks fine for me.  Anyone else?
 [2006-06-15 16:53 UTC] pajoye@php.net 
I will test it and commit, it looks ok but I prefer a little test before :)
 [2006-09-29 08:10 UTC] wiesemann@php.net 
(Pierre is not active anymore)
 [2006-10-03 15:59 UTC] mj@php.net 
assigning this to myself; will commit this in the next days.
 [2006-10-04 05:18 UTC] mj@php.net 
Looking at your patch made me wonder if inactive developers should be listed in the mails at all?  It is unlikely that they are willing to answer support questions, which is the reason for listing the authors there in the first place.
 [2006-10-04 05:26 UTC] wiesemann@php.net 
> Looking at your patch made me wonder if inactive
> developers should be listed in the mails at all?
> It is unlikely that they are willing to answer
> support questions, which is the reason for listing
> the authors there in the first place.

My intention was to give these people credits. But as the mail are sent out for single releases, credits are enough for the actively working people. Credits for the package itself are given on the package info page on the website.

=> I'm fine with showing only the active people.
 [2006-10-06 07:41 UTC] mj@php.net 
This bug has been fixed in CVS.

If this was a documentation problem, the fix will appear on pear.php.net by the end of next Sunday (CET).

If this was a problem with the pear.php.net website, the change should be live shortly.

Otherwise, the fix will appear in the package's next release.

Thank you for the report and for helping us make PEAR better.
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2024 The PHP Group
All rights reserved. 		Last updated: Wed Apr 24 03:01:29 2024 UTC