php.net |  support |  documentation |  report a bug |  advanced search |  search howto |  statistics |  random bug |  login

go to bug id or search bugs for

Bug #41249 [raw]urldecode memory consumption
Submitted: 2007-05-01 05:57 UTC Modified: 2007-05-01 17:49 UTC
Votes:1
Avg. Score:5.0 ± 0.0
Reproduced:1 of 1 (100.0%)
Same Version:1 (100.0%)
Same OS:1 (100.0%)
From: 3172continuum at gmail dot com Assigned:
Status: Not a bug Package: Performance problem
PHP Version: 5.2.1 OS: w2k
Private report: No CVE-ID: None
View Add Comment Developer Edit
Welcome! If you don't have a Git account, you can't do anything here.
You can add a comment by following this link or if you reported this bug, you can edit this bug over here.
(description)
Block user comment
Status: Assign to:
Package:
Bug Type:
Summary:
From: 3172continuum at gmail dot com
New email:
PHP Version: OS:

 

 [2007-05-01 05:57 UTC] 3172continuum at gmail dot com 
Description:
------------
every call of [raw]urldecode consumes (iirc) like 200 extra bytes of my memory!

if i just delete parts of the array like below, i have a workaround for the next few weeks... this may though not be useful to other users...

i traced it down to this single line which starts with $IMPORT_filepath

Reproduce code:
---------------
//the next line use several extra bytes on each call, why that?????
#$IMPORT_filepath = rawurldecode($res[$i]->path);
$IMPORT_filepath = urldecode($res[$i]->path);
//with this extra line, memory usage gets lowered:
$res[$i] = '';

Patches

Add a Patch

Pull Requests

Add a Pull Request

History

AllCommentsChangesGit/SVN commitsRelated reports
 [2007-05-01 17:25 UTC] iliaa@php.net 
Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php

Speed vs Memory situation here. Given most uses of urldecode() extra bit 
of speed is more important then a tiny amount of memory.
 [2007-05-01 17:49 UTC] 3172continuum at gmail dot com 
well, its a converter and a sourcefile of more than 800k lines
that would be 160M used in the script just for calling this function 800k times
and its not even recursive or anything like this...
just by calling a function, afterwards more memory is used!??!!

furthermore i dont understand why this isnt a bug :-\
 
PHP Copyright © 2001-2024 The PHP Group
All rights reserved. 		Last updated: Fri Apr 19 06:01:29 2024 UTC